For the Love of God(2007) Damien Hirst
Research Damien Hirst's work For the Love of God (2007) in order to answer the following questions;
1. Describe the work, giving details of the form and materials.
'For the love of God' created by Damien Hirst in 2007. It is a platinum cast of an actual 200-year-old male adult human skull that Hirst picked up in a London taxidermy shop. He created the Expensive head infrastructure, then he used 8,601 diamonds weighing more than 1100 carats like he was spreading seeds on a Chia Pet. The single large diamond in the middle of the forehead is reportedly worth $4.2 million alone. Set in the middle of the forehead and breaking up the even pattern of
smaller jewels that follow the exact contours of the bone is a large,
pear-shaped diamond surrounded by smaller diamond petals.At the end of work Hirst took the real human teeth from the original skull and set them in the jawbones of the skull.
2. What does the work mean? What is Damien Hirst communicating in the work?
The Diamond skull never shows in the art history, it is a fresh eye-catching work which represents a traditional "memento mori", an object that speaks of the transience of human existence. According to Rudi Fuchs: "The skull is supernatural, almost heavenly. Proclaims victory over decay. At the same time represents death as something infinitely more relentless. Compared to the tearful sadness of a vanitas scene, the Skull of Diamonds is pure glory. " That's how communicated to Damien Hirst, he proved how human existence with gorgeous life, just like he said:"I wouldn't mind if it happened to my skull after my death." http://www.artquotes.net/masters/hirst/for-the-love-of-god.htm
The Diamond skull never shows in the art history, it is a fresh eye-catching work which represents a traditional "memento mori", an object that speaks of the transience of human existence. According to Rudi Fuchs: "The skull is supernatural, almost heavenly. Proclaims victory over decay. At the same time represents death as something infinitely more relentless. Compared to the tearful sadness of a vanitas scene, the Skull of Diamonds is pure glory. " That's how communicated to Damien Hirst, he proved how human existence with gorgeous life, just like he said:"I wouldn't mind if it happened to my skull after my death." http://www.artquotes.net/masters/hirst/for-the-love-of-god.htm
3. How does Hirst's diamond encrusted skull relate to Mercantilism and to conspicuous consumption?


http://www.escapeintolife.com/essays/for-the-love-of-god/
4. How much did the work cost, and how much was it sold for, and who bought it?
The skull cost $20 million to make, including diamonds and fabrication. London’s White Cube gallery announced that British artist Damien Hirst diamond-encrusted skull sold for $100 million dollars, a record price for work sold by a living artist.
http://www.artknowledgenews.com/Damien_Hirst_For_The_Love_Of_God.html
5. What are some of the differing opinions of the journalists in the newspaper and blog articles?
What did they think of the work?
Damien Hirst is not the world's greatest current artist. But he's probably its savviest. Hirst explores the uncertainty at the core of human experience; love, life, death, loyalty and betrayal through unexpected and unconventional media. art historian Rudi Fuchs has said, “The skull is out of this world, celestial almost. … At the same time it represents death as something infinitely more relentless. Compared to the tearful sadness of a vanitas scene, the diamond skull is glory itself.”
6. Based on your research, what is your opinion of the work, as an object or a work of art.
I strongly agree "For the Love of God"as a work of perfect art. Due to skull's mysterious no body created this form before, until Hirst broke the rule. I think most people would agree that their skulls are a priceless asset. But what artist Damien Hirst has done to the following skull has actually made a nondescript skull into one of the most expensive pieces of art ever. He created by cost $20 millions after he could gain more and more. That's a really good expel for me to known what is Mercantilism about and how he can be so succeed.
Damien Hirst's 'For the Love of God', is a piece that has quite a lot to do with the ideals of Mercantilism, such as the desire of money, and the flaunting of fabulosity, such as the skull clearly expresses. However, one thing that I thought of when looking at the two ideas together, is that Hirst's use of bones to denote something ethereal or celestial was an idea used by many churches. All over 15th century Europe are churches decorated with bones. For me, that was an interesting connection to make.
回复删除For #3 I think you didnt mention the main point of how it relates to conspicuous consumption, which is because it is encrusted with expensive diamonds, which is a waste of money on something useless, which relates to mercantilism. In my opinion this resembles the back of a girls cellphone cover encrusted with fake jewels, or fake jewels on nails, or 'grills' (gold/diamonds on teeth) on gangsters, which are all types of "bling" to show off how much money a person has, or just looks luxurious. Diamond mining is extremely destructive to the environment and to diamond miners, so to use so many diamonds on something so useless which relates to mercantilism, how people destroy the environment for profit.
回复删除For #5 you could mention more of other journalists different opinions and what they thought of the work. As you mentioned, gagosian.com gives a positive review by saying "“The skull is out of this world, celestial almost. … At the same time it represents death as something infinitely more relentless. Compared to the tearful sadness of a vanitas scene, the diamond skull is glory itself." They talk about it like it's a really meaningful piece of artwork. However, Boingboing.net talks about it like a random piece of artwork influenced by Mexican skulls encrusted in turquoise, but is just a diamond version. They mention that death is such a heavy subject, "it would be good to make something that laughed in the face of it.” They also mention the work's potential to be about death in a more literal way. It could be something that people might die of since diamond mining is extremely destructive to the environment and to diamond miners
From guardian.co.uk's article, they talk about it like it is nothing special. They say it is a £50m disco ball and that "securing an interview with God himself would be easier than setting eyes on Damien Hirst's latest work". They describe Hirst sitting in a beautiful penthouse office dressed in scruffy clothes- scruffed boots and a tattered shirt, and he casually talks about his diamond incrusted work as if it as any old piece of artwork, and that "it is hard to see the object itself behind the dazzle of light". I think they emphasised the crowds fuss over the work more than the meaning behind the work, and how it is just a highly expensive disco ball, gaining attention with its dazzling lights, and that it is nothing special.
http://www.gagosian.com/artists/damien-hirst/
http://boingboing.net/2007/06/02/damien-hirsts-diamon.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/artblog/2007/jun/01/hirstsskullmakesdazzlingde
From reading information about it, it seems that there is no intentional meaning behind it, and that it was a random idea inspired by Mexican skulls encrusted in turquoise.
Damien hirst thought it would be great to do a diamond one, but it would be prohibitively expensive, which is why he thought it was a good idea.
There was another artist who created a replica covered with Swarovski crystals and dumped it outside on top of a pile of trash outside the gallery in response to his work.
http://www.ad-i.co.uk/2007/07/15/damien-hirsts-diamond-skull-trashed-by-artist/
I agree with her, I don't like his work and think it was created randomly with no intentional meaning, and it’s as if he just experimented with diamonds because he had the money.
When I look at it I think maybe the person that died was rich and of high status and people decorated his skull with diamonds, however it was said that Hirst just used the skull of some random man, which he got from a shop. The 2nd possible meaning I think of is that someone could'nt let go of someones death and put diamonds on it to preserve the skull, but I don't think Hirst made it for that reason. And the 3rd idea I get from it is conspicuous consumption, in which it communicates very well. Other than that, I dont think it looks good or conveys any other meaning effectively.
It nice blog entry,I can see how you saw the relation between the skull and the idea of Mercantilism.He like to show off in punlic."For The love of God"is the most expenstive artwork his mad.I think most people would agree that their skulls are a priceless asset.People has many arguments aobut his work,whatever there talks in my opinion I think this is great artwork!
回复删除I enjoyed reading your entry. I think your opinion is a good one on the idea of his works being a piece of art rather than an object but in my opinion it is an object. Damien Hirst made this piece of work pretty much just because he could. His work is a piece of "eye candy". I believe it may have a bit of meaning behind it, but it just could be me trying to put some meaning behind it.
回复删除